People of Russian Heritage vs People of Polish Heritage vs People of Thai Heritage
Write an 800 words essay contracting the three study heritages.
Mention in the essay if there is any similarity in their healthcare belief.
Mention how do they see health and disease and their customs to deal with them. Discuss how they view dead.
How their health care belief affect or influence the delivery of evidence-based healthcare.
You must use at least 3 evidence-based references.
A minimum of 800 words (not counting the first and reference page are required).
Culture in Nursing
APA format word document, APA A minimum of 2 evidence-based references (besides the class textbook) no older than 5 years must be used. A minimum of 800 words is required and not exceeding 1,000 words (excluding the first and reference page). Please make sure to follow the instructions as given and use either spell-check or Grammarly before you post your assignment.
Read chapter 10 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentation. Once done answer the following questions;
Describe and discuss the influence of culture on mental health care values, beliefs, and practices.
Identify and discuss specific cultural values, beliefs, and practices of three diverse cultural groups and how transcultural mental health nurses might facilitate culturally congruent care in a mental health care system.
Compare and contrast your cultural values, beliefs, and practices about mental health care with another cultural group.
Identify and discuss five communication skills that facilitate culturally competent mental health care.
Nursing Theory
Describe Duffy's Quality-Caring Model related to concepts. Provide an example
Discussion
What may be an ethical dilemma for one registered nurse may not be an ethical dilemma for another registered nurse."" Be sure to define an ethical dilemma in the course of your discussion. Describe a challenging situation in your nursing career that required you to consider the ethical dimensions of the patient case and the role you played in providing care. (Be sure to respect and maintain patient and colleague confidentiality.)
Prompt 2
Apply the framework of The Five R’s approach to ethical nursing practice from this week's reading to answer the questions about values and choices.
What are values?
Q. What are your personal values?
Q. Why do you value them?
Q. What are the values in your society?
Q. How do you make choices?
Q. Are your choices based on your values?
Q. What values are useful in society?
What are the limits to personal choice?
Q. Who limits your choices?
Q. Are limits to choices good?
Q. Do you limit other people's choices?
Q. Should the health care organization or the government limit people's choices? If so, how, and under what circumstances?
Prompt 3
Finally, consider this: A common idea in health care is that if you are drawn to health care as a profession, you are inherently guided by an inner compass that is composed of a strong moral framework. Why is this a dangerous assumption?
1 page for each prompt
Psychotherapy With Individuals
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
After watching Episode 1, describe:
What is Mr. Levy’s perception of the problem?
What is Mrs. Levy’s perception of the problem?
What can be some of the implications of the problem on the family as a whole?
After watching Episode 2, describe:
What did you think of Mr. Levy’s social worker’s ideas?
What were your thoughts of her supervisor’s questions about her suggested therapies and his advice to Mr. Levy’s supervisor?
After watching Episode 3, discuss the following:
What were your thoughts about the way Mr. Levy’s therapist responded to what Mr. Levy had to say?
What were your impressions of how the therapist worked with Mr. Levy? What did you think about the therapy session as a whole?
Informed by your knowledge of pathophysiology, explain the physiology of deep breathing (a common technique that we use in helping clients to manage anxiety). Explain how changing breathing mechanics can alter blood chemistry.
Describe the therapeutic approach his therapist selected. Would you use exposure therapy with Mr. Levy? Why or why not? What evidence exists to support the use of exposure therapy (or the therapeutic approach you would consider if you disagree with exposure therapy)?
In Episode 4, Mr. Levy tells a very difficult story about Kurt, his platoon officer.
Discuss how you would have responded to this revelation.
Describe how this information would inform your therapeutic approach. What would you say/do next?
In Episode 5, Mr. Levy’s therapist is having issues with his story.
Imagine that you were providing supervision to this therapist, how would you respond to her concerns?
Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Assessing the Abdomen
Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.
With regard to the Episodic note case study provided:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
The Assignment
Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
Week 6: Assessment of the Abdomen and Gastrointestinal SystemABDOMINAL ASSESSMENTSubjective:•CC: “My stomach hurts, I have diarrhea and nothing seems to help.”•HPI: JR, 47 yo WM, complains of having generalized abdominal pain that started 3 days ago. He has not taken any medications because he did not know what to take. He states the pain is a 5/10 today but has been as much as 9/10 when it first started. He has been able to eat, with some nausea afterwards.•PMH: HTN, Diabetes, hx of GI bleed 4 years ago •Medications: Lisinopril 10mg, Amlodipine 5 mg, Metformin 1000mg, Lantus 10 units qhs•Allergies: NKDA•FH: No hx of colon cancer, Father hx DMT2, HTN, Mother hx HTN, Hyperlipidemia, GERD •Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)Objective:•VS: Temp 99.8; BP 160/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 248lbs•Heart: RRR, no murmurs•Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical•Skin: Intact without lesions, no urticaria •Abd: soft, hyperactive bowel sounds, pos pain in the LLQ•Diagnostics: NoneAssessment:•Left lower quadrant pain •GastroenteritisPLAN: This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.
Summary
This week, you will submit summaries of quantitative and qualitative studies. The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with published research, research designs, and methodologies. For the assignment, you will select one quantitative research study and one qualitative study related to the field of nursing and write a summary of each study. Each summary must be accurate, succinct, and clear. These articles should be somewhat related to your PICOT questions.
Ensure the following questions are addressed in each summary:
1. What type of research is it (quantitative, qualitative, and design)?
2. What was the research question(s) or hypothesis?
3. What is the sample, the sample size, and sample attributes?
4. What was the setting of the study?
5. What were the researcher’s findings? (Identify one.)
You must submit the research study articles along with your summaries.
Each summary should be between 150–250 words.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points 150
HCI Interview
Interview a nurse manager to explore the external factors that influence decision making such as health policy, regulatory requirements, accreditation, health care financing. Write a 4 – 5 page paper summarizing and analyzing your interview with the nurse manager. Rubric is at the end of the syllabus.
Due in module 3
Goal: Identify the external factors that influence nurse manager’s decision making.
Content requirements for this assignment:
1. Provide an overview of the role of the nurse manager interviewed. Summarize the information from the interview (do not report the interview question by question)
2. Perceptions related to impact on health policy on decision. Perceptions related to impact of regulatory agencies on decision making. Perceptions related to impact of health care financing on decision making.
3. Analysis of the interview supported by the literature.
Format Requirements: The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling. The paper is to be no shorter than 4 pages; nor longer than 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library (Links to an external site.) has a copy of the APA Manual).
Your paper should be formatted per APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions).
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Rubric
Presentation RubricPresentation RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems4.0 ptsDistinguishedIdentify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.3.0 ptsExcellentIdentifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.2.0 ptsFairIdentifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.1.0 ptsPoorIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms4.0 ptsDistinguishedPresents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.3.0 ptsExcellentPresents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.2.0 ptsFairPresents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.1.0 ptsPoorPresents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding4.0 ptsDistinguishedProvides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.3.0 ptsExcellentProvides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.2.0 ptsFairProvides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.1.0 ptsPoorProvides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature4.0 ptsDistinguishedEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.3.0 ptsExcellentEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.2.0 ptsFairIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.1.0 ptsPoorIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesIncludes speaker's notes and the assigned number of slides.4.0 ptsFull MarksDemonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.3.0 ptsExcellentDemonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.2.0 ptsFairDemonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.1.0 ptsPoorDemonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.4.0 pts
Total Points: 20.0
Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
Direct Practice Improvement
DNP- Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project Proposal Chapter 2 - Literature Review,"Chapter 2 of the Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project Proposal is titled ""Literature Review"" and expands upon work you completed in DNP-820 in the Develop a Literature Review assignment. Synthesis of the literature in the Literature Review (Chapter 2) defines the key aspects of the learner's scholarly project, such as the problem statement, population and location, clinical questions, variables or phenomena (if relevant to the project), methodology and design, purpose statement, data collection, and data analysis approaches. The literature selected must illustrate strong support for the learner's practice change proposal.
TOPIC: Impact of Medication Administration Errors on 3-4-Year-old Leukemia Patients
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the ""DPI Proposal Template"" in the PI Workspace of the DC Network.
· Locate the Develop a Literature Review assignment you completed in DNP-820.
· Locate the ""Research Article Chart"" resource in the DC network Course Materials.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Directions:
Use the ""DPI Proposal Template"" and the “Develop a Literature Review” assignment from DNP-820 to develop a draft of a literature review (Chapter 2) for your DPI Project Proposal. The literature review (Chapter 2) is required to be a minimum of 20-25 pages including a minimum of 50 scholarly citations. You have already completed some of this review in previous courses. No less than 85% of the articles must have been published in the past 5 years. Articles selected must provide strong, reliable support for the proposal.
Use the following DPI proposal template’s criteria to create your draft Literature Review (Chapter 2):
1. Access and review the DPI Project Template for Chapter 2 criteria
o Sections of this Chapter include:
§ Introduction to the Chapter and Background to the Problem
§ Theoretical Foundations
§ Review of Literature including Themes and Sub-themes
§ Summary
1. Using the Clinical Question/PICOT question components, identify at least two themes which will organize the literature review .
2. Identify at least three subthemes that relate to each theme (six subthemes total).
3. Identify at least three empirical or scholarly articles related to each subtheme (18 articles total). At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology.
4. Use the ""Research Article Chart"" resource as a guide to: (a) analyze and synthesize the literature into your paper, (b) state the article title, (c) identify the author, (d) state the research question(s), (e) identify the research sample, (f) explain the research methodology, (g) identify the limitations in the study, (h) provide the research findings of the study, and (i) identify the opportunities for practice implementation. For scholarly, nonempirical articles, state the article title and author, and provide a brief contextual summary of the article.
Resources
Read:
Sole, M. L., Talbert, S., Bennett, M., Middleton, A., Deaton, L., & Penoyer, D. (2018). Collecting Nursing Research Data 24 Hours a Day: Challenges, Lessons, and Recommendations. American Journal of Critical Care, 27(4), 305–311.
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=130296171&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read:
Hammer, M. J. (2017). Research Ethics in Big Data. Oncology Nursing Forum, 44(3), 293–295.
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122723364&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read:
Corwin, E., Jones, D., & Dunlop, A. (2019). Symptom science research in the era of big data: Leveraging interdisciplinary resources and partners to make it happen. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 51(1), 4-8.
URL:https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/2169563196?accountid=7374
