Evidence-based Practice And The Quadruple Aim

Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:

· Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.

· Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.

· Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

· Patient experience

· Population health

· Costs

· Work life of healthcare providers

Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Write a brief analysis of the connection between  evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address  how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple  Aim, including each of the four measures of:

·  Patient experience

 ·  Population health

 ·  Costs

 ·  Work life of healthcare providers

77 (77%) - 85 (85%)

The analysis clearly  and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either  supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

  The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four  measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of  healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

  The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two  outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting  the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside  resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the  analysis provided with credible and detailed examples.

68 (68%) - 76 (76%)

The analysis  accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not  support the Quadruple Aim.

  The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience,  population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or  does not support the Quadruple Aim.

  The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource  reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim.  The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three  course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may  include some detailed examples.

60 (60%) - 67 (67%)

The analysis  inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports  or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

  The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of  patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers  either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

  The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures  supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate  analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources  that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples.

0 (0%) - 59 (59%)

The analysis  inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either  supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

  The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of  patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers  either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

  The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures  supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate  analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources  to support the analysis provided or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and  Organization:

 Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed  ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are  carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided  which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is  provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of  the time.

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is  brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79%  of the time.

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off  topic.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and  sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less  than 60% of the time.

  No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

 Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct  grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one  or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several  (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (five  or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the  reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct  APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,  indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations,  and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA  format with no errors.

Course Readings

Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 172–175. doi:10.1111/wvn.12126

Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence-based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340–348. doi:10.1111/wvn.12171